MethodologyTransparent assumptions
Methods

What the ArcticSoak Score actually measures.

A standardized planning model designed for comparison, not a claim about the power consumption of any specific cold plunge.

Reference setup

The national index models a covered, insulated 100-gallon outdoor plunge maintained at 50°F. It assumes 0.84 kWh/day of baseline circulation/filtration power, an effective thermal conductance of 11 BTU/hour/°F, and a chiller coefficient of performance of 2.2. Those assumptions are deliberately held constant for every city.

Climate data

The automated updater requests the National Centers for Environmental Information's 1991–2020 U.S. Monthly Climate Normals for stations near each indexed city. It also attempts to obtain a recent 30-day temperature average from NOAA/NCEI Daily Summaries. If NOAA data cannot be fetched during a refresh, the last successful NOAA value is retained; the bundled first-run dataset contains approximate seed values.

NOAA/NCEI Monthly Normals · NOAA/NCEI Daily Summaries

Electricity prices

The updater uses the U.S. Energy Information Administration API route for electricity sales to ultimate customers by state and sector, selecting the residential sector and latest available monthly average retail price. EIA publishes this series in cents per kilowatt-hour. A free EIA API key is recommended for automatic refreshes.

EIA Retail Electricity Sales & Prices

Energy calculation

For each month, ArcticSoak calculates an approximate temperature-holding load from the positive difference between monthly average ambient temperature and the 50°F target. That load is divided by the assumed chiller COP and added to baseline circulation consumption. Monthly energy is multiplied by the state's electricity rate.

ArcticSoak Score

The score is a 0–100 comparative index. Seventy-five percent reflects climate cooling burden and twenty-five percent reflects estimated annual electricity cost. It is intentionally relative: a score of 85 means the reference setup is easier/cheaper to cool than a city scoring 30 under the same assumptions.

Important limitations

Reuse and attribution

The downloadable ArcticSoak CSV may be cited in articles, research and reporting with attribution and a link to ArcticSoak.com. Please describe outputs as estimates from the ArcticSoak reference model rather than measured appliance energy consumption.